Invasion costs, impacts, and human agency: response to Sagoff 2020
Overview & Synopsis
Ryan 2018a,b). Evidence-based scientific debate (i.e., informed skepticism) indicates a healthy discipline; however, repeating unsupported claims and disregarding decades of evidence negates knowledge progression, adversely affects public attitudes, and misleads policy makers. Sagoff (2020) ignores a large empirical evidence base 1
Indexed from repository: HAL Open Science
(
hal.science)
Keyboard Shortcuts:
← / → for pages • + / - for zoom • 0 to fit width
Powered by Mozilla PDF.js v3.11
Document Information
| Document Title | Invasion costs, impacts, and human agency: response to Sagoff 2020 |
|---|---|
| Author / Organization | Ross N Cuthbert, Sven Bacher, Tim M Blackburn, Elizabeta Briski, Christophe Diagne, Jaimie T A Dick, Franz Essl, Piero Genovesi, Phillip J Haubrock, Guillaume Latombe, Bernd Lenzner, Yves Meinard, Aníbal Pauchard, Petr Pyšek, Anthony Ricciardi, David M Richardson, James C. Russell, Daniel Simberloff, Franck Courchamp |
| Subject & Discipline | Multidisciplinary Academic Open Research |
| Categories | Science & Mathematics |
| Publication Year | 2020 |
| License / Rights | Open Access / Creative Commons |
| Resource Verification | Listed PDF (Verification Pending) |
| Original Host Website |
HAL Open Science
(hal.science)
|
| File Format | application/pdf (Portable Document Format) |
| Language | EN |
| Catalog ID | DOC-47753 |
| Original Source Link | Visit Source Page on hal.science » |