Cervical maturation in breech presentation: Mechanical versus prostaglandin methods.
Overview & Synopsis
ObjectiveBreech presentation at term accounts for around 5% of births. Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of different induction methods for breech presentations. We aim to compare the mode of delivery after induction by intra cervical dilatation balloon compared to prostaglandin (PGE2) in breech presentation. We also evaluated the risk factors associated with a failure of induction.MethodsSingle-center retrospective study from January 2000 to December 2020 including all women induced from 36 weeks, breech presentation, with a single pregnancy without contraindication to vaginal delivery and with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop 30 kg/m2 (OR= 3.15 CI95%: (1,374 - 7,224)).ConclusionMode of delivery after mechanical methods in breech delivery induction appears similar to prostaglandins. However, it should be noted that in half of the cases, additional maturation with prostaglandin was necessary, calling into question the value of the mechanical methods. Factors associated with cesarean were maternal characteristics (nulliparity and BMI > 30 kg/m2) but not induction method.
hal.science)
← / → for pages • + / - for zoom • 0 to fit width
Powered by Mozilla PDF.js v3.11
Document Information
| Document Title | Cervical maturation in breech presentation: Mechanical versus prostaglandin methods. |
|---|---|
| Author / Organization | M. Khobzaoui, L. Ghesquiere, Elodie Drumez, Veronique Debarge, Damien Subtil, Charles Garabedian |
| Subject & Discipline | Multidisciplinary Academic Open Research |
| Categories | Science & Mathematics |
| Publication Year | 2022 |
| License / Rights | Open Access / Creative Commons |
| Resource Verification | Listed PDF (Verification Pending) |
| Original Host Website |
HAL Open Science
(hal.science)
|
| File Format | application/pdf (Portable Document Format) |
| Language | EN |
| Catalog ID | DOC-36807 |
| Original Source Link | Visit Source Page on hal.science » |