๐Ÿ“–
How Tuning, Reference Preview, Actuator Modeling, and Fallback Policies Change Quadrotor Controller Comparisons: A Reproducible Simulation Study
Xuan-Quy Dao, Le-Minh Nguyen, Ngoc-Bich Le

How Tuning, Reference Preview, Actuator Modeling, and Fallback Policies Change Quadrotor Controller Comparisons: A Reproducible Simulation Study

Science & Mathematics Published 2026 Verification Pending

Overview & Synopsis

Quadrotor controller comparisons commonly report a single tracking error, although the resulting ranking also depends on tuning effort, reference information, actuator prediction, optimizer fallback, and command timing. We quantify these effects for cascade PID, hover LQR, boundary-layer sliding-mode control (BL-SMC), linear MPC with LQR fallback (LMPC-F), a preview-enabled LMPC-F, and a geometric $SO(3)$ controller on a common nonlinear plant with rotor gyroscopic coupling, motor lag, and saturation. A primary study (556 episodes at 50~Hz) combines matched twelve-candidate tuning, 400 paired evaluation episodes, and a 48-cell MPC factorial; a confirmation study (1462 episodes) repeats the evaluation on 50 fresh realizations with tuning budgets of 12, 24, and 48 candidates. A matched twelve-candidate tuning protocol changed the mean-RMSE ordering obtained with the fixed baseline settings, moving BL-SMC from last to first; the new ordering recurred on the fresh realizations, and a 48-candidate budget left it unchanged. Reference preview substantially reduced MPC tracking error and, on the figure-eight task, removed fallback activity. On an abrupt step, the outcome depended on the interplay between fallback policy, predictor, and actuator authority. Command timing also changed the outcome: replaying measured command-call delays terminated three of four nominal MPC configurations on a desktop computer and all four on a Raspberry Pi~5, whereas capping the solver at 100 iterations removed every deadline miss in the tested nominal timing profiles. Controller rankings therefore depend not only on tracking accuracy but also on the tuning protocol, reference information, fallback behavior, and implementation timing. We propose a reporting checklist covering tracking accuracy, tuning effort, completion and failure rates, fallback activity, applied-input variation, and command timing.

Indexed from repository: arXiv (arxiv.org)
Loading document from verified source...
Keyboard Shortcuts: ← / → for pages • + / - for zoom • 0 to fit width Powered by Mozilla PDF.js v3.11

Document Information

Document Title How Tuning, Reference Preview, Actuator Modeling, and Fallback Policies Change Quadrotor Controller Comparisons: A Reproducible Simulation Study
Author / Organization Xuan-Quy Dao, Le-Minh Nguyen, Ngoc-Bich Le
Subject & Discipline cs.RO
Categories Science & Mathematics
Publication Year 2026
License / Rights arXiv Open Access / Creative Commons
Resource Verification Listed PDF (Verification Pending)
Original Host Website arXiv (arxiv.org)
File Format application/pdf (Portable Document Format)
Language EN
Catalog ID DOC-3542
Original Source Link Visit Source Page on arxiv.org »