Multi-Tool Selection for Robotic Systems: Comparing Semantic Retrieval and LLM

Overview & Synopsis

Natural-language interfaces allow users to command robotic systems without interacting directly with mission planners or robotics middleware. Their reliable use depends on robot tool routing, defined here as the selection of the smallest complete subset of predefined executable capabilities required to satisfy a request. This task is particularly difficult for compound instructions, where incomplete selection may omit necessary sensing or monitoring capabilities, while excessive selection may expose irrelevant tools. We compare four routing strategies: three progressively refined ChromaDB-based methods - fixed-threshold retrieval, relative-distance retrieval, and clause-aware aggregated retrieval - and a cloud-hosted 120-billion-parameter language-model baseline. The methods are evaluated on 164 manually annotated prompts organised into three complexity levels, from direct single-tool requests to compound requests requiring at least three tools. Using exact-match accuracy, completeness, precision, a completeness-weighted composite score, and routing latency, CDB-v3 achieves the best macro-average score among the retrieval-only methods, with 0.7822, compared with 0.8869 for the large-model baseline. Although the LLM provides higher routing quality, CDB-v3 exhibits substantially lower latency and can be deployed locally without requiring cloud connectivity. These results identify a quality-latency trade-off between direct large-model selection and clause-aware semantic retrieval for privacy-sensitive, connectivity-constrained, and resource-constrained robotic systems.