๐Ÿ“–
Pipelining vs. Combining in Aggregation Tasks
Gabriel Marques Domingues, Claire Mathieu, Boaz Patt-Shamir

Pipelining vs. Combining in Aggregation Tasks

Science & Mathematics Published 2026 Verification Pending

Overview & Synopsis

We study the aggregation task (convergecast) in networks in the case that the values to be aggregated do not fit in a single message. We assume that every node starts with an input value, and there is an aggregation operator that is commutative, associative, and length-preserving, i.e., the result of aggregating two values has the same length as each of the input values. Since values do not fit in a message, they are transferred in a ``train'' of pipelined messages, which must be terminated whenever we want to aggregate values. The goal is to minimize the makespan time of aggregating all values. We present general lower bounds on the problem and optimal algorithms for several prevalent parallel computing architectures, including the hypercube and complete bipartite graphs, under both the splittable and unsplittable flows models. We also present an $O(\log n)$ approximation for general graphs in the unsplittable flows model.

Indexed from repository: arXiv (arxiv.org)
Loading document from verified source...
Keyboard Shortcuts: ← / → for pages • + / - for zoom • 0 to fit width Powered by Mozilla PDF.js v3.11

Document Information

Document Title Pipelining vs. Combining in Aggregation Tasks
Author / Organization Gabriel Marques Domingues, Claire Mathieu, Boaz Patt-Shamir
Subject & Discipline cs.DC
Categories Science & Mathematics
Publication Year 2026
License / Rights arXiv Open Access / Creative Commons
Resource Verification Listed PDF (Verification Pending)
Original Host Website arXiv (arxiv.org)
File Format application/pdf (Portable Document Format)
Language EN
Catalog ID DOC-263435
Original Source Link Visit Source Page on arxiv.org »