Eliciting preferences for well-being measurement: A comparison of methods
Overview & Synopsis
The elicitation of willingness to pay remains a serious empirical challenge. Such elicitation is important for cost-benet analysis. It is also central to the estimation of equivalent income, a multidimensional measure of well-being that respects individual preferences by adjusting income to incorporate an individual's willingness to pay to achieve a reference level in non-income dimensions. In this paper, we test four different preference elicitation methods with an online survey of almost 2,000 French respondents. Our experimental design allows us to compare both between-and within-respondent variations in willingness to pay and equivalent income. In addition, we consider two non-income dimensions: health and social interactions, the latter of which has been relatively neglected in welfare economics literature. We find large dierences between the elicited values across methods and dimensions.
hal.science)
← / → for pages • + / - for zoom • 0 to fit width
Powered by Mozilla PDF.js v3.11
Document Information
| Document Title | Eliciting preferences for well-being measurement: A comparison of methods |
|---|---|
| Author / Organization | Shaun da Costa, Marc Fleurbaey, Santiago Burone, Capucine Jaud, Erik Schokkaert, Koen Decancq, Clémence Thébaut, Brigitte Dormont |
| Subject & Discipline | Multidisciplinary Academic Open Research |
| Categories | Science & Mathematics |
| Publication Year | 2025 |
| License / Rights | Open Access / Creative Commons |
| Resource Verification | Listed PDF (Verification Pending) |
| Original Host Website |
HAL Open Science
(hal.science)
|
| File Format | application/pdf (Portable Document Format) |
| Language | EN |
| Catalog ID | DOC-236727 |
| Original Source Link | Visit Source Page on hal.science » |