📖
Ingratiation: Experimental Evidence
Stéphane Robin, Agnieszka Rusinowska, Marie Claire Villeval

Ingratiation: Experimental Evidence

Science & Mathematics Published 2014 Verification Pending

Overview & Synopsis

We investigate experimentally ingratiatory behavior expressed by opinion conformity. Both individuals' performance at a task and their opinions on various topics can be observed before unequal payoffs are assigned by a second mover. In some treatments, first movers can change their opinion after learning that held by the second mover. We find evidence of high ingratiation indices, as opinion conformity is rewarded. However, second movers reward conformity less when it is common knowledge that opinions can be manipulated strategically. Introducing a monetary cost for changing opinion reduces ingratiation. Introducing performance-related pay for the second mover makes ingratiation less rewarding but does not eliminate it completely. Reducing the noise in the measurement of ability has little effect.

Indexed from repository: HAL Open Science (hal.science)
Loading document from verified source...
Keyboard Shortcuts: ← / → for pages • + / - for zoom • 0 to fit width Powered by Mozilla PDF.js v3.11

Document Information

Document Title Ingratiation: Experimental Evidence
Author / Organization Stéphane Robin, Agnieszka Rusinowska, Marie Claire Villeval
Subject & Discipline Multidisciplinary Academic Open Research
Categories Science & Mathematics
Publication Year 2014
License / Rights Open Access / Creative Commons
Resource Verification Listed PDF (Verification Pending)
Original Host Website HAL Open Science (hal.science)
File Format application/pdf (Portable Document Format)
Language EN
Catalog ID DOC-227939
Original Source Link Visit Source Page on hal.science »