📖
Reply to Commentary on "Mapping the electric field vector of guided ionization waves at atmospheric pressure", Plasma Research Express, 2 (2020) 025014.
Sylvain Iséni

Reply to Commentary on "Mapping the electric field vector of guided ionization waves at atmospheric pressure", Plasma Research Express, 2 (2020) 025014.

Author / Organization:
Science & Mathematics Published 2022 Verification Pending

Overview & Synopsis

This is a Reply to the Comment of Dozias S., Pouvesle J.-M. and Robert E. on the paper "Mapping the electric field vector of guided ionization waves at atmospheric pressure'". The criticism in the Comment, namely that the measurements and the subsequent interpretations are wrong, seems to be invalid. Additional information will be detailed to discuss the point of view of the authors. However, the criticism raises an interesting comparison of two data sets presented in a normalized color scale. The resulting figure clearly supports the argument that the plasma-induced electric field measurements are consistent and validates the experimental investigation.

Indexed from repository: HAL Open Science (hal.science)
Loading document from verified source...
Keyboard Shortcuts: ← / → for pages • + / - for zoom • 0 to fit width Powered by Mozilla PDF.js v3.11

Document Information

Document Title Reply to Commentary on "Mapping the electric field vector of guided ionization waves at atmospheric pressure", Plasma Research Express, 2 (2020) 025014.
Author / Organization Sylvain Iséni
Subject & Discipline Multidisciplinary Academic Open Research
Categories Science & Mathematics
Publication Year 2022
License / Rights Open Access / Creative Commons
Resource Verification Listed PDF (Verification Pending)
Original Host Website HAL Open Science (hal.science)
File Format application/pdf (Portable Document Format)
Language EN
Catalog ID DOC-224826
Original Source Link Visit Source Page on hal.science »