Reply to Commentary on "Mapping the electric field vector of guided ionization waves at atmospheric pressure", Plasma Research Express, 2 (2020) 025014.
Overview & Synopsis
This is a Reply to the Comment of Dozias S., Pouvesle J.-M. and Robert E. on the paper "Mapping the electric field vector of guided ionization waves at atmospheric pressure'". The criticism in the Comment, namely that the measurements and the subsequent interpretations are wrong, seems to be invalid. Additional information will be detailed to discuss the point of view of the authors. However, the criticism raises an interesting comparison of two data sets presented in a normalized color scale. The resulting figure clearly supports the argument that the plasma-induced electric field measurements are consistent and validates the experimental investigation.
Indexed from repository: HAL Open Science
(
hal.science)
Keyboard Shortcuts:
← / → for pages • + / - for zoom • 0 to fit width
Powered by Mozilla PDF.js v3.11
Document Information
| Document Title | Reply to Commentary on "Mapping the electric field vector of guided ionization waves at atmospheric pressure", Plasma Research Express, 2 (2020) 025014. |
|---|---|
| Author / Organization | Sylvain Iséni |
| Subject & Discipline | Multidisciplinary Academic Open Research |
| Categories | Science & Mathematics |
| Publication Year | 2022 |
| License / Rights | Open Access / Creative Commons |
| Resource Verification | Listed PDF (Verification Pending) |
| Original Host Website |
HAL Open Science
(hal.science)
|
| File Format | application/pdf (Portable Document Format) |
| Language | EN |
| Catalog ID | DOC-224826 |
| Original Source Link | Visit Source Page on hal.science » |