Abduction in argumentation: Two representations that reveal its different functions
Overview & Synopsis
Abduction can function in argumentation and proving processes in different ways. In this paper we focus on the ways in which abductive arguments, taking place in argumentation and proving processes, can be reconstructed in the frame of a Global Argumentation Structure (GAS). We propose two different ways to model abductive arguments within a GAS, with a forward or a backward flow, depending on the function of these arguments in the whole argumentation.
Indexed from repository: HAL Open Science
(
hal.science)
Keyboard Shortcuts:
← / → for pages • + / - for zoom • 0 to fit width
Powered by Mozilla PDF.js v3.11
Document Information
| Document Title | Abduction in argumentation: Two representations that reveal its different functions |
|---|---|
| Author / Organization | Chrysi Papadaki, David Reid, Christine Knipping |
| Subject & Discipline | Multidisciplinary Academic Open Research |
| Categories | Science & Mathematics |
| Publication Year | 2019 |
| License / Rights | Open Access / Creative Commons |
| Resource Verification | Listed PDF (Verification Pending) |
| Original Host Website |
HAL Open Science
(hal.science)
|
| File Format | application/pdf (Portable Document Format) |
| Language | EN |
| Catalog ID | DOC-185146 |
| Original Source Link | Visit Source Page on hal.science » |