Chapter Was the Serpent’s Argumentation Conclusive? A Few Words That Go back to the Beginning of our Reasoning as a Gift to the Knower of Rationality
Overview & Synopsis
The paper deals with the problem of transition in argumentation from a statement that everything except one is permitted to the conclusion that nothing is permitted; the motivation of the analysis is a story of the biblical serpent from Genesis 2-3. We suppose that the reasoning of the serpent is an example of nonconclusive argumentation, i.e.. an argument pars pro toto (apparent enthymeme) which can be often found in contemporary argumentations.
Indexed from repository: Directory of Open Access Books
(
www.doabooks.org)
Document Information
| Document Title | Chapter Was the Serpent’s Argumentation Conclusive? A Few Words That Go back to the Beginning of our Reasoning as a Gift to the Knower of Rationality |
|---|---|
| Author / Organization | Lechniak, Marek |
| Subject & Discipline | Open Access Peer-Reviewed Book |
| Categories | Open Access Books |
| Publication Year | 2025 |
| License / Rights | Open Access / Creative Commons |
| Resource Verification | Listed PDF (Verification Pending) |
| Original Host Website |
Directory of Open Access Books
(www.doabooks.org)
|
| File Format | application/pdf (Portable Document Format) |
| Language | EN |
| Catalog ID | DOC-139424 |
| Original Source Link | Visit Source Page on www.doabooks.org » |