Using Function Words for Authorship Attribution: Bag-Of-Words vs. Sequential Rules
Overview & Synopsis
Authorship attribution is the task of identifying the author of a given document. Various style markers have been proposed in the literature to deal with the authorship attribution task. Frequencies of function words have been shown to be very reliable and effective for this task. However, despite the fact that they are state-of-the-art, they basically rely on the invalid bag-of-words assumption, which stipulates that text is a set of independent words. In this contribution, we present a comparative study on using two different types of style marker based on function words for authorship attribution. We compare the effectiveness of using sequential rules of function words as style marker that do not relay on the bag-of-words assumption to that of the frequency of function words which does. Our results show that the frequencies of function words outperform the sequential rules.
hal.science)
← / → for pages • + / - for zoom • 0 to fit width
Powered by Mozilla PDF.js v3.11
Document Information
| Document Title | Using Function Words for Authorship Attribution: Bag-Of-Words vs. Sequential Rules |
|---|---|
| Author / Organization | Mohamed Amine Boukhaled, Jean-Gabriel Ganascia |
| Subject & Discipline | Multidisciplinary Academic Open Research |
| Categories | Science & Mathematics |
| Publication Year | 2014 |
| License / Rights | Open Access / Creative Commons |
| Resource Verification | Listed PDF (Verification Pending) |
| Original Host Website |
HAL Open Science
(hal.science)
|
| File Format | application/pdf (Portable Document Format) |
| Language | EN |
| Catalog ID | DOC-109889 |
| Original Source Link | Visit Source Page on hal.science » |