Science & Mathematics

Depression assessment from counseling speech requires integrating textual and acoustic psychological evidence across turns, yet existing end-to-end classification approaches lack explicit multimodal evidence interpretation and context-aware reasoning. We propose AudiPsy, an evidence-grounded omni-LLM for depression assessment over spoken counseling conversations. AudiPsy employs an Observation-Assessment-Summary (OAS) paradigm to integrate dialogue transcripts, textual and acoustic emotions, and textual-acoustic emotion incongruence into structured reasoning. OAS incrementally organizes multimodal observations, performs contextualized assessment, and maintains an evolving dialogue summary for subsequent turns. To support this framework, we construct AudiPsy-Counsel, a synthetic spoken counseling conversation corpus with multimodal context augmentation, and develop a unified three-stage curriculum for depression-oriented reasoning. Experiments on DAIC-WOZ demonstrate superior depression assessment performance over specialized depression detection methods and general-purpose speech/omni-LLMs, along with improved reasoning quality, while supplementary evaluation on EATD-Corpus supports AudiPsy's applicability to naturalistic conversations.

Neural combinatorial optimization has enabled fast constructive solvers for the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP), yet most autoregressive models still construct solutions through sequential node selection and represent route organization only implicitly. We investigate whether route-level customer co-assignment can be modeled explicitly and used to guide this node-level decision process. To this end, we propose TopologyAware RouteConsistency Modeling (TRCM), which reuses node representations from a standard autoregressive construction pipeline to predict pairwise same-route probabilities and injects them into customer selection as a route-consistency signal. Because sameroute supervision is both class-imbalanced and structurally uneven, TRCM combines structure-preserving augmentation with Topological Entropy (TE)- based reweighting to emphasize locally ambiguous customer pairs. Under matched decoding budgets, TRCM reduces the optimality gap from 3.67% to 3.28% on CVRP50 and from 2.11% to 1.99% on CVRP100; under 8-fold augmented inference, it reduces the CVRP100 gap from 1.61% to 1.49%. On XML100, TRCM*8Aug improves the average objective by 0.24%, with larger gains on several structurally informative factors. A controlled demand-reassignment test over 500 variants further shows more concentrated objective fluctuations. These results support explicit route-consistency modeling as an effective structural principle for autoregressive neural routing.

Mainstream Web3 SDKs (e.g., ethers.js, viem) bundle three coupled assumptions: an account-based ledger, a single secp256k1 signer, and input-selection-free transaction construction. These assumptions fail once a chain adopts an extended-UTXO model (here, the Cell model on Nervos CKB), and once the wallet population spans heterogeneous cryptographic primitives (secp256k1, WebAuthn, Schnorr). Using CKBers' Codebase (CCC), a TypeScript SDK, this retrospective case study extracts three recurring patterns from release history and exported APIs: a Transaction Composer that makes capacity-aware input completion and fee estimation declarative, a Unified Signer Abstraction that normalizes signing across heterogeneous wallets behind one interface, and a Connector UI component that ships per-wallet onboarding as a drop-in. The contribution is the articulation of these patterns as transferable design lessons for SDKs targeting UTXO-family ledgers and heterogeneous wallet populations.

Tabular foundation models (TFMs) pretrain a transformer on large-scale synthetic priors so that a single forward pass yields zero-shot tabular prediction. TabICLv2 samples the class count of its classification prior during pretraining, and the prevailing configuration caps it at ten. We report a counter-intuitive result: setting this cap directly to two---making every pretrained classification task binary---still yields weights that perform zero-shot K-way classification 2. On the 38 TabArena classification datasets (200 bootstrap rounds, anchored at default RF = 1000), the binary two-stage recipe reaches 1590.1 Elo, above the official default at 1568.0 (+22.1), above TabPFN-v2.6 (1577.1) and RealTabPFN-v2.5 (1521.6). A production-scale validation on 60 real-world credit-scoring institutions independently confirms the direction: the same checkpoint improves test AUC on 44 of 60 institutions (paired Wilcoxon p = 0.0007 for AUC, p = 0.0002 for KS) at +1.5 inference cost. Mechanistically, classification in TabICLv2 is carried not by a fixed-cardinality output head but by an in-context comparison operator matching query-row embeddings against class-conditional embeddings, so the cardinality of the output space is set by the labels present in the context, not by the label space seen during pretraining. This makes a binary prior structurally cheaper to generate and cache than a ten-class prior, demotes "number of classes" from an architectural constraint to a tunable hyperparameter, and points to a class-count-agnostic regime of TFM pretraining.

Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) offer a principled framework for quantifying epistemic uncertainty. However, standard weight-space priors yield complex, high-dimensional neural network posteriors that are computationally prohibitive to sample from, and popular approximate inference schemes often fail to capture epistemic uncertainty effectively---a failure mode particularly acute in reinforcement learning (RL) \citep{osband2018randomized}. To resolve this challenge, we introduce a new class of BNNs that quantify uncertainty by placing Bayesian nonparametric Dirichlet Process (DP) priors directly on the underlying data-generating distribution rather than on network parameters. Building on this foundation, we develop DP-DQN, a reinforcement learning algorithm that leverages DP-BNNs to maintain posterior distributions over value functions and perform efficient Thompson sampling. By grounding randomized value functions in Bayesian nonparametrics, DP-DQN unifies data-driven posterior reweighting (via the Bayesian Bootstrap) with generative prior hypotheses injected directly through the DP base measure, enabling decisive ``deep exploration'' with a single neural network without the overhead of multi-network ensembles.

Multimodal sentiment analysis (MSA) aims to understand user-generated videos by integrating multiple modalities. Existing methods often treat modalities as symmetric, overlooking the fact that language provides a dominant semantic prior while nonverbal signals are complementary and noise-prone. To address this, we propose a Text-Anchored Modality Experts with Uncertainty-Guided Routing, termed TAME, that reformulates MSA as an uncertainty-guided refinement paradigm, where the language prior is calibrated and enhanced by selectively trusted nonverbal evidence. Specifically, TAME adopts an asymmetric Mixture-of-Modality-Experts framework, in which textual features act as a fixed and always-activated shared expert, while audio-textual and video-textual cross-modal branches serve as dynamically routed auxiliary experts. Furthermore, we introduce lightweight Prophet Heads to quantify the sample-level predictive uncertainty of each individual modality, and this uncertainty metric is further incorporated into the modality router to realize reliability-aware expert aggregation and fusion. Experiments on CMU-MOSI, CMU-MOSEI, and CH-SIMS datasets demonstrate that TAME achieves state-of-the-art performance on the majority of metrics while reducing parameter count by up to 78.7% and FLOPs by up to 41.2% over the mixture-of-expert baseline.

Porous-material adsorption studies require coordinated structure preparation, force-field selection, simulation, validation, and interpretation, making end-to-end automation difficult. We test whether RaspAssistant, a hierarchical multi-agent framework, can carry an adsorption study from force-field preparation through validation and downstream separation analysis. Across twelve multi-agent workflow-reproduction runs spanning four adsorption and separation benchmarks, overall scores ranged from 8.50 to 10.00 on a rubric evaluating workflow correctness, simulation validity, and analysis consistency. In a separate eight-case force-field extraction benchmark, the mean weighted score was 0.967, combining parameter agreement and RASPA readiness. In open-ended studies, the system diagnosed and refined an acetylene force field and, after validating a CO$_2$ force field against MFI experiments, screened 197 pure-silica zeolites that passed automated input checks. These results demonstrate autonomous workflow execution after task specification and input provision: RaspAssistant coordinates, validates, adapts, and documents extended adsorption-simulation workflows while exposing model sensitivity and methodological limitations for expert review.

Large language models (LLMs) can influence user trust and decision-making through subtle linguistic cues, yet the behavioral effects of manipulative outputs remain poorly quantified. We introduce a behavioral computing framework for measuring \textit{behavioral vulnerability}, defined as users' susceptibility to manipulative AI responses. Building on DarkPatterns-LLM benchmark, we generate controlled manipulative stimuli using Manipulation Gradient Descent (MGD), targeting biases associated with authority, urgency, and social proof. We analyze participant responses using the Multi-Stakeholder Impact Assessment Network (MSIAN) to model cross-user influence and the Temporal Harm Propagation Model (THPM) to characterize the persistence of behavioral effects over time. In a study involving 120 participants, manipulative framing produced significant changes in trust calibration and compliance ($p < 0.01$), with effects also propagating across social contexts. These findings highlight the need to extend LLM safety evaluation beyond model outputs to measurable behavioral consequences and provide a computational framework for quantifying individual, social, and temporal risks arising from manipulative AI interactions.

Multi-agent systems are increasingly deployed to coordinate multiple large language model (LLM) agents. However, this also creates new attack surfaces: malicious agents may have chances to exploit the coordination. In this paper, we propose and study the \textit{show-up attack}, in which a malicious subagent manipulates the supervisor into involving it in tasks beyond its assigned scope. To evaluate this risk, we propose SUA-Arena, which implements 6 attack strategies and contains 188 test cases. Then, we evaluate 6 frontier LLMs and find that all of them are vulnerable to show-up attacks. For example, GPT-5.6-Sol as a supervisor suffers an ASR of up to 0.93. Mitigation strategies such as prompting and restricted communication fail to reduce the risk consistently. These results show that multi-agent systems need explicit mechanisms for enforcing authority boundaries.

Model-based reinforcement learning in partially observable environments requires inferring hidden states, learning latent dynamics, and planning under the resulting belief. Practical algorithms often solve one aspect of the above pipeline while relying on approximations for the others that are often poorly understood, while existing POMDP theory typically analyzes computationally inefficient theoretical algorithms far from modern deep RL practice. To fill this gap, we propose a practical end-to-end algorithm that approximately solves the hidden state filtering problem via sequential Monte Carlo (SMC), updates a latent dynamics model online, and performs approximate online planning for $d$ steps before bootstrapping leaves with a state-value critic (a QMDP approximation). We analyze each approximation and prove an end-to-end regret bound decomposing the error into model estimation error, particle filter error, Monte Carlo rollout error, and a structural bias term induced by the QMDP approximation controllable by the planning depth that we further analyze in various special cases. The resulting guarantee makes explicit how statistical sample size, particle budget, rollout budget, and planning depth affect performance. We instantiate our algorithm in an MPC-based deep RL framework, demonstrating its practicality on a variety of environments. On a POMDP that satisfies our assumptions, each term of the bound decays at its predicted rate. Our results provide a practical and theoretically grounded route for bridging theory and practice within online decision-making in POMDPs.

With increasing autonomy, Large Language Models (LLMs) may engage in deceptive behaviors, such as scheming to pursue misaligned goals or sandbagging to escape oversight. Monitoring outputs alone is insufficient, as models can produce seemingly benign responses while harboring misaligned internal objectives. While mechanistic approaches like linear probing are promising, they rely on the assumption that deception corresponds to a single direction in representation space. We demonstrate that such single-direction probes fail to generalize across diverse deception scenarios. To bridge this gap, we propose representing deception as a multi-dimensional subspace rather than a single direction. Our method utilizes iterative orthogonal decomposition to identify complementary directions that capture distinct facets of deceptive intent. To effectively leverage these directions for detection, we find that static combinations prove brittle due to strong domain dependence across different scenarios. We therefore introduce a domain-adaptive gating mechanism that dynamically composes the extracted directions through few-shot adaptation at test time. With only 10 examples, our approach achieves an average AUROC of 0.97 and 94% recall at 5% FPR across all evaluated datasets, substantially outperforming existing methods.

Factual recall is a lookup: some representation inside the network serves as the key, and what that key is made of decides which queries can retrieve the fact, what an edit must cover, and what a retriever can read. We call it the factual access state. In autoregressive (AR) models the subject position enriches attributes largely independently of the relation, and relation-specific selection happens later, at the readout position. In masked diffusion language models (DLMs) we find the state is assembled differently, and much earlier: in the first attention layer the wording of the relation is routed into the position of whichever entity is visible and the early feed-forward layers look the fact up on this fused representation. The state therefore varies with the relation's surface form and with the query direction, so the queries about one fact occupy a region of state space rather than a point, and an operation on the fact succeeds only for queries that enter it. We treat the state as an interface to a DLM's factual knowledge, and put it to two uses. Writing to the state gives a knowledge editor: from one declarative statement, Multi-View Edit fits one shared value per direction across that region and installs it in the early-MLP block, preserving source-prompt reliability while substantially improving paraphrase and reverse question answering, where AR editors gain near zero. Reading it suggests a complementary use: the state at each entity position can serve as a relation-specific retrieval vector with no training, returning both pieces of evidence for two-entity queries on which pooled, prompted and lexical retrievers almost never return both.

Full-duplex speech agents must update persistent memory while listening and speaking, yet it remains unclear which events should be stored, revised, or excluded. Existing benchmarks isolate interaction timing from memory outcomes, obscuring the state transitions behind a correct answer. We introduce DuplexLedger, a bilingual benchmark of 1,094 persistent sessions aligning four full-duplex scenarios with event-level Write/Update/Ignore/Retain supervision, explicit pre/post memory states, and 6,564 same-session questions and checks. Evaluating five full-duplex models reveals an interaction-memory gap: no system combines strong boundary control with coherent final-state memory, and the best final-state fact coverage is 2.01%. We propose ACT-Mem, an 8.92M-parameter sidecar comprising an event controller, a versioned transactional ledger, and a typed retriever coupled with a frozen MiniCPM-o 4.5 backbone. On 219 held-out sessions, ACT-Mem increases latest-value accuracy from 4.11% to 8.68% while reducing stale assertions and distractor adoption. It improves interaction boundaries but slows interruption stopping. These results motivate selective, auditable full-duplex memory rather than indiscriminate transcript retention. Code is available at https://github.com/lyx-researcher/DuplexLedger.

Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) predict multiple token positions per forward pass, yet block-wise decoders serialize generation and repeatedly recompute stable predictions. We attribute this inefficiency to coupling a prediction's readiness for irreversible commitment with its utility as context. We introduce Tentative Context Pipelining (TeCoP), a training-free decoder that decouples these roles through staggered block-parallel pipelining and draft-and-verify. TeCoP reuses stable but uncommitted predictions as provisional cross-block context, with commitment governed by confidence and stability checks. Across four LLaDA and Dream dLLMs on GSM8K, Minerva MATH, and MBPP, TeCoP reduces number of forward evaluations by up to 87% and achieves up to 7.50-fold throughput without KV caching and 11.77-fold with caching over the uncached original decoder. It outperforms Fast-dLLM and DSB in throughput across all 12 model-benchmark settings, with and without caching, while keeping average cached accuracy within one percentage point of the original decoder.

Diffusion language models (DLMs) are emerging as a practical alternative to autoregressive language models (ARLMs), yet their fairness remains largely uncharacterized. DLMs introduce sampling controls with no direct autoregressive counterpart, such as block length and remasking strategy, that directly set their speed--quality operating point. This raises a basic question: does a DLM's measured social bias remain stable across these settings? Across LLaDA, LLaDA-1.5, and Dream on Open-BBQ, we find that all three models exhibit social bias, but both the magnitude of measured bias and the relative ordering of models by bias are highly sensitive to the sampling configuration. This sampling dependence also changes what successful debiasing means. While mitigation strategies established for ARLMs transfer effectively to DLMs and reduce bias without degrading downstream performance, sampling dependence persists even after mitigation. Our results show that fairness in DLMs cannot be characterized independently of the sampling configuration, even after debiasing. Project page is available at https://pakapaka333.github.io/Beyond-Model-Weights/.