Science & Mathematics

Проблеми формування й розвитку комунікативної компетентності особистості насьогодні є надзвичайно актуальними, що підсилюється активними процесами цифровізаціїсуспільства і освіти, розвитком цифрових технологій, новими формами цифровоїкомунікації, які призводять до оновлення змісту і структури комунікативної компетентності.Спробуємо проаналізувати, як наразі тлумачиться поняття «комунікативнакомпетентність» в іноземному науковому дискурсі.

(Uploaded by Plazi from the Biodiversity Heritage Library) No abstract provided.

(Uploaded by Plazi from the Biodiversity Heritage Library) No abstract provided.

(Uploaded by Plazi from the Biodiversity Heritage Library) No abstract provided.

(Uploaded by Plazi from the Biodiversity Heritage Library) No abstract provided.

Adelius excelsus Bortoni & Shimbori sp. n.(Figs 43–51)urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: E0DAA759-3B76-4309-8485-736C03B3382FType material. Holotype ♀ (IAvH 150251): “ Colombia, Boyacá, SFF Iguaque, Lagunillas, 5°25'N 73°27'W, 3380 m, Malaise, 03–28.iii.2001, P. Reina, m.1511”.Paratypes: one ♀, same as holotype, Cerro Pan de Azucar, 5°26'N 73°27'W, 3300 m, Malaise, 29.vi–18.vii.2001, P. Reina Leg., m.1965; one ♀, Colombia, Cundinamarca, PNN Chingaza, Laguna de Chingaza, 4°31'N 73°45'W, 3240 m, Malaise, 18.vi–02.vii.2003, J. Guzmán, m.3920; two ♀ s; same data, Alto de la Bandera, 4°31'N 73°45'W, 3660 m, Malaise, 02–15.vii.2003, J. Sinisterra, m.3913; one ♀, same data, Piedras Gordas, 4°31'N 73°45'W, 3880 m, Malaise, 5–19.vi.2002, A. Perez Leg., m.3226; one ♀, same data, PNN Sumapaz Bocatoma, Cerro el Zapato, 4°14'N 73°27'W, 3560 m, Malaise, 18.xi–4.xii.2002, A. Patino Leg. M.3443 (IAvH); one ♂ (UKHI). Label: “ Costa Rica: Heredia, 6km ENE Vara Blanca 9.iv.2002, 10°11’N 84°07’W, INBio-OET-ALAS”Description of holotype, ♀. Body length: 2.3 mm. fore wing length: 2.2 mm.Color. Black. Metasoma except T1 dark brown. All legs with narrow yellow band at base of femur and apex of trochantellus. Wings moderately infuscate, veins brown and stigma pale brownHead. Length of head in dorsal view 0.5× longer than wide in dorsal view. Antennae as long as body; subapical flagellomeres expanded ventrally; scape 2.5× longer than wide. Eye height 2.0× malar space length. Sculpturing mostly smooth and polished; striate dorsally around eyes at temples and face. Malar suture present.Mesosoma. Mesoscutum punctate. Notauli absent. Propleuron smooth. Pronotum smooth with a rugose groove. Scutellar sulcus with six divisions, scutellum punctate. Mesoscutellar trough strongly rugose-costate. Metanotum rugose. Mesopleuron smooth with sternaulus crenulate. Metapleuron rugose. Propodeum with anterior aspect strongly rugose medially and a pair of lateral carinae; posterior aspect mostly smooth, with a pair of weakly diverging carinae medially enclosing a narrow and irregular areola; transverse carina distinct and complete, not interrupted medially.Wings. Fore wing vein r present, 0.25× stigma height; vein R1 0.36× stigma length; stigma 2.9× longer than high.Legs. Hind legs with inner tibial spurs about 0.21× tibia; tibia 5.8× longer than its maximum width. All legs smooth except hind coxae rugose dorsally.Metasoma. Smooth except for some weak striation at base. Hypopygium long, extending over metasomal length and truncate, ovipositor sheaths distinctly exerted, longer than first flagellomere and more than 0.5× basitarsus.Variation. Body length 1.8–2.6 mm; fore wing length 1.8–2.6 mm. Striation at temples variable in extension, covering most of this region to present just near eyes. One paratype has the lighter bands on legs and stigma darker, mostly brown. One ♀ paratype has reduced sculpturing on propodeum and lacks areola at its posterior aspect.Male. Body length: 2.1 mm; Fore wing length: 1.45 mm. The known male is from Costa Rica and it mostly agrees with ♀ description, except for its tibia relatively wide at apical half, about 4.3× longer than its maximum width. The propodeum at posterior aspect, as in one of the ♀ paratypes, is mostly smooth and without any indication of areola. As in other males, the antenna has no ventrally expanded flagellomeres.Diagnosis. Adelius excelus sp. n. is similar to A. ecuadoriensis sp. n., differing from it mainly by the absence of a mid-longitudinal carina at face (present in A. ecuadoriensis), by the mostly smooth and polished head (which is distinctly punctate in A. ecuadoriensis), and by the relatively smaller eyes (2× longer than the malar space, as compared with about 3× longer in A. ecuadoriensis). Additionally, A. excelsus usually has a distinct light band at the base of all femora (although it may be narrow and lightly contrasting), whereas in A. ecuadoriensis the legs are entirely dark brown.Biology. Unknown.Distribution. Sampled from both Colombia and Costa Rica at high elevations (from 3,200 up to 3,880 meters above sea level in Colombia and at about 2,000 meters in Costa Rica).Etymology. The name is from the Latin word excelsus meaning “high or lofty,” referring to the distribution of this species at high elevations.

(Uploaded by Plazi from the Biodiversity Heritage Library) No abstract provided.

Pinheiro, Felipe L, De Simão-Oliveira, Daniel, Butler, Richard J (2020): Osteology of the archosauromorph Teyujagua paradoxa and the early evolution of the archosauriform skull. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 189 (1): 378-417, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz093, URL: https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/189/1/378/5585773

(Uploaded by Plazi from the Biodiversity Heritage Library) No abstract provided.

(Uploaded by Plazi from the Biodiversity Heritage Library) No abstract provided.

(Uploaded by Plazi from the Biodiversity Heritage Library) No abstract provided.

Genus Baguoidea Mahmood, 1967Baguoidea Mahmood, 1967: 40. — Qin et al. 2010: 55; 2014: 1498 (key).TYPE SPECIES. — Baguoidea rubra Mahmood, 1967 by original designation.DISTRIBUTION. — Mainland Asia (Sri Lanka, Myanmar and China), Philippines and Japan (?), see Remarks of B. rufa below.REMARKSThis monotypic genus is tentatively regarded as distinct from Dayus. It differs only in having the basal group setae of the subgenital plate blunt-tipped (also found in some Homa species) and distal macrosetae more numerous (Fig. 3L) and in lacking an unusual ventral apodeme of the 8 th abdominal sternite, found in Dayus. In other respects, it is similar to Dayus in its overall red colour, having the 3rd apical cell in the forewing petiolate (Fig. 3C), male pygofer with processes (Fig. 3G), form of the subgenital plate and aedeagus and well developed male basal dorsal abdominal apodemes (Fig. 3M). The genus was redescribed by Yu & Yang (2013) as there were some errors in Mahmood’s original description and figures, which also had implications on subsequent studies (see Remarks under B. rufa below). Yu & Yang (2013) also noted that Dworakowska (1973) had stated (and figured) that the facial laterofrontal sutures were absent in Baguoidea but were present in their specimens, and are also present in the specimens studied here. This apparent mistake by Dworakowska may have been due to the sutures being obscure against the red facial colour.

(Uploaded by Plazi from the Biodiversity Heritage Library) No abstract provided.

(Uploaded by Plazi from the Biodiversity Heritage Library) No abstract provided.