๐Ÿ“–
Greener Choices in Biliary Imaging: A Prospective Carbon Footprint Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography for Intermediate-Likelihood Choledocholithiasis.
Rughwani H, Jagtap N, de Jong DM, Tyagi A, Putta T, Pasumarthy A, Khair Khan A, Kalapala R, Ramchandani M, Lakhtakia S, Reddy DN

Greener Choices in Biliary Imaging: A Prospective Carbon Footprint Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography for Intermediate-Likelihood Choledocholithiasis.

Medicine & Health Published 2026 Verification Pending

Overview & Synopsis

Open access biomedical research article published in Clin Transl Gastroenterol.

Advertisement
SPONSOR CONTENT
Indexed from repository: PubMed Central (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
Loading document from verified source...
Keyboard Shortcuts: ← / → for pages • + / - for zoom • 0 to fit width Powered by Mozilla PDF.js v3.11

Document Information

Document Title Greener Choices in Biliary Imaging: A Prospective Carbon Footprint Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography for Intermediate-Likelihood Choledocholithiasis.
Author / Organization Rughwani H, Jagtap N, de Jong DM, Tyagi A, Putta T, Pasumarthy A, Khair Khan A, Kalapala R, Ramchandani M, Lakhtakia S, Reddy DN
Subject & Discipline Clin Transl Gastroenterol
Categories Medicine & Health
Publication Year 2026
License / Rights Open Access / Creative Commons
Resource Verification Listed PDF (Verification Pending)
Original Host Website PubMed Central (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
File Format application/pdf (Portable Document Format)
Language EN
Catalog ID DOC-42661
Original Source Link Visit Source Page on pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov »