๐Ÿ“–
Quantitative Flow Ratio- vs Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Secondary Analysis of the FAVOR III China Trial.
Zhang H, Shi Y, Guan C, Cui J, Wu X, Chen L, Shen C, Yang J, Liu X, Jin Y, Wang L, Su X, Yang Q, Shen Z, Zhao Y, Dou K, Yang W, Wang J, Wu Y, Fearon WF, Tu S, Escaned J, Qiao S, Song L, Stone GW, FAVOR III China Study Group

Quantitative Flow Ratio- vs Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Secondary Analysis of the FAVOR III China Trial.

Medicine & Health Published 2026 Verification Pending

Overview & Synopsis

Open access biomedical research article published in JAMA Netw Open.

Advertisement
SPONSOR CONTENT
Indexed from repository: PubMed Central (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
Loading document from verified source...
Keyboard Shortcuts: ← / → for pages • + / - for zoom • 0 to fit width Powered by Mozilla PDF.js v3.11

Document Information

Document Title Quantitative Flow Ratio- vs Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Secondary Analysis of the FAVOR III China Trial.
Author / Organization Zhang H, Shi Y, Guan C, Cui J, Wu X, Chen L, Shen C, Yang J, Liu X, Jin Y, Wang L, Su X, Yang Q, Shen Z, Zhao Y, Dou K, Yang W, Wang J, Wu Y, Fearon WF, Tu S, Escaned J, Qiao S, Song L, Stone GW, FAVOR III China Study Group
Subject & Discipline JAMA Netw Open
Categories Medicine & Health
Publication Year 2026
License / Rights Open Access / Creative Commons
Resource Verification Listed PDF (Verification Pending)
Original Host Website PubMed Central (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
File Format application/pdf (Portable Document Format)
Language EN
Catalog ID DOC-38592
Original Source Link Visit Source Page on pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov »