SecODD: Adapting the Operational Design Domain from Driving Autonomy to Autonomous Cyber Defense
Overview & Synopsis
Security operations centers are beginning to delegate detection, triage, and containment to Autonomous Cyber Defense (ACD) agents at execution time. Erroneous high-impact playbooks can disrupt critical services and create accountability gaps among deployers, SOC supervisors, vendors, managed service providers, and infrastructure providers. We propose SecODD, an execution-time governance framework for ACD that adapts the Operational Design Domain concept from autonomous-vehicle regulation to cyber autonomy. It defines the authorized scope of automated defensive actions, models when meaningful human intervention must remain possible, and specifies auditable due-care conditions through a Mitigation Safe Harbor. Four engineering requirements---tamper-evident logging, human-in-the-loop orchestration, rollback playbooks, and safe-state transition controls---are evaluated through a per-scenario audit matrix that illustrates how two ACD failure modes can be translated into pass/fail audit outcomes. The result is an evidence-oriented framework that authorizes ACD only when autonomous actions are bounded, interruptible, recoverable, and reconstructable from evidence.
arxiv.org)
← / → for pages • + / - for zoom • 0 to fit width
Powered by Mozilla PDF.js v3.11
Document Information
| Document Title | SecODD: Adapting the Operational Design Domain from Driving Autonomy to Autonomous Cyber Defense |
|---|---|
| Author / Organization | Jina Kang, Jeong-Han Yun, Hyesong Choi |
| Subject & Discipline | cs.CR |
| Publication Year | 2026 |
| License / Rights | arXiv Open Access / Creative Commons |
| Resource Verification | Listed PDF (Verification Pending) |
| Original Host Website |
arXiv
(arxiv.org)
|
| File Format | application/pdf (Portable Document Format) |
| Language | EN |
| Catalog ID | DOC-276762 |
| Original Source Link | Visit Source Page on arxiv.org » |