Means-Ends Analysis Helps LLMs Plan in Continuous-State Domains
Overview & Synopsis
LLM planning research has traditionally focused on discrete-state domains, where actions form a finite, enumerable set. Existing LLM planning frameworks largely assume actions are enumerable, modeling planning as a search process over candidate actions. However, in continuous-state domains, where actions form a continuum and cannot be enumerated, this assumption breaks down. We find a remedy in Newell and Simon's Means-Ends Analysis (MEA), a general problem-solving technique rooted in heuristics from human psychology. We develop Medaka, an MEA-inspired structured prompting framework that encourages recursive goal decomposition, algebraic derivation, and per-step state tracking. To evaluate native LLM planning abilities in continuous-state domains, we develop Liquidworld, a systematic testbed on liquid mixing. On Liquidworld, Medaka can improve performance across model families, suggesting that classical means-ends analysis elicits LLM-native reasoning abilities that are helpful for continuous-state planning.
arxiv.org)
← / → for pages • + / - for zoom • 0 to fit width
Powered by Mozilla PDF.js v3.11
Document Information
| Document Title | Means-Ends Analysis Helps LLMs Plan in Continuous-State Domains |
|---|---|
| Author / Organization | Jiayi Li, Carl Kingsford |
| Subject & Discipline | cs.AI |
| Publication Year | 2026 |
| License / Rights | arXiv Open Access / Creative Commons |
| Resource Verification | Listed PDF (Verification Pending) |
| Original Host Website |
arXiv
(arxiv.org)
|
| File Format | application/pdf (Portable Document Format) |
| Language | EN |
| Catalog ID | DOC-276645 |
| Original Source Link | Visit Source Page on arxiv.org » |