Science & Mathematics

Large language models increasingly automate optimization modeling from natural language problems, producing written mathematics, solver code and a returned report. Verifying one optimization problem across these artifacts requires semantic comparison: unequal models can attain the same objective, equivalent models can use different auxiliary variables, and mutually consistent artifacts can omit the same source requirement. ORSMT provides a typed semantic interface and exact SMT relation queries. It aligns observable decisions, projects auxiliary variables, proves or refutes feasible region and objective relations, localizes refutations to implicated rows or domains and links source texts when available. It then reconstructs one artifact from another, and each adopted candidate passes the required relation checks. Across 3,034 problems and six generator sizes, ORSMT improves the model-code match rate in all 72 benchmark and generator combinations before selection. Protected selection raises the aggregate rate from 43.2% to 88.2% and the share that are both correct and matched from 25.2% to 40.2%. On the 1,905 refuted outputs, certified voting under the shared fallback makes 50.9% of outputs correct and matched, compared with 44.8% for ReLoop and 49.4% for Opt-Verifier. A separate one-round source revision followed by exact reconstruction restores a model-code match for 84.4% of the refuted pairs.

Deductive verification scales to large software systems through modular reasoning, where formal contracts summarize the behavior of individual functions and enable their independent verification. Its central bottleneck is specification synthesis: constructing the contracts required for modular verification. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled automated specification synthesis at unprecedented scale. However, existing approaches remain fundamentally bottom-up, requiring callees to be verified before their callers. This dependency limits parallelism and provides no principled mechanism for resolving interprocedural inconsistencies that propagate across call chains. We present VERDICT, a multi-agent framework for parallelizing modular deductive verification of large-scale programs. VERDICT is built on two key principles. First, assumption-based parallel specification synthesis assigns an agent to each function and allows it to proceed immediately using assumed contracts for its callees, enabling verification to proceed in parallel across the program. Second, bidirectional interprocedural conflict reconciliation resolves the inconsistencies introduced by these assumptions: when a synthesized contract contradicts an assumption, agents propagate the necessary revisions both up and down the call graph until the contracts converge. Experimental results on real-world C programs show that VERDICT synthesizes higher-quality specifications than existing approaches while substantially reducing verification time. In particular, VERDICT is the first approach that scales to the complete 20,000-line X.509 parser, ruling out nearly all the potential runtime errors within hours, whereas prior tools like PREGUSS fall far short even after days of execution.

Learning safe policies that generalize to unseen environments is difficult under bounded actuation, where an unsafe decision may become unrecoverable. Conventional control barrier function (CBF) filters enforce only instantaneous safety and ignore future recoverability. We propose SAFTER (Safety-Aware Filtering Through Explicit Recoverability), which embeds a differentiable, closed-form backup-CBF filter into Soft Actor-Critic training. SAFTER unifies current safety, finite-horizon backup safety, terminal recoverability, and input admissibility into a single differentiable certificate. Its CBF condition yields an exact minimum-intervention projection without iterative online optimization. In quadruped navigation, SAFTER reaches 90% training success with 30.6% fewer transitions than Vanilla SAC and 34.1-35.1% fewer than current-state CBF-filtered SAC baselines. Across unseen simulated environments, SAFTER improves success by up to 42.4 and 61.4 percentage points over the state-of-the-art methods CBF-RL and SEA-Nav, respectively, and achieves 73.3% and 76.7% success on two real-world navigation maps. Ablations identify accurate differentiation through the safety filter as a key contributor to robustness, in which replacing the projection Jacobian with the identity approximation reduces success rate in a High-Shift environment from 61.4% to 6.2%. These results show that recoverability-aware filtering serves as both a runtime safety mechanism and a learning mechanism for sample-efficient, robust policies.

Timbre similarity is a key evaluation target for generative speech systems, including voice conversion, speaker-cloning text-to-speech, and zero-shot speech models. When the generated voice does not match the target speaker, the problem often reflects imperfect separation of speaker-related timbre from content, making it important to identify where timbre information resides and which representations still carry it. Using speaker identity as a measurable proxy, we probe frequency bands, phase/magnitude structure, WORLD source/filter decomposition, voiced/unvoiced regions, self-supervised learning (SSL) layers, EnCodec/HuBERT tokens, and a 45-listener test across Mandarin, English, and Japanese speech/singing data. Speaker information is distributed: 1--8 kHz magnitude and vocal-tract spectral-envelope structure dominate perception, above-8 kHz bands remain machine-discriminative, shallow SSL layers expose compact speaker information, and token leakage depends on tokenizer/layer choice. These findings indicate where generation systems should condition on or transform speaker information, and where content, codec, and token pipelines should audit residual speaker leakage.

A generated chest radiograph can be useful as declared augmentation, but the same image becomes unsupported evidence when submitted as the record of a real examination. We study this problem by separating three questions: whether an image passes an automated quality check, whether an origin classifier flags it as generated, and whether a trusted record supports the claimed acquisition. In our experiments, Qwen selects up to 20 images from pools of 1,000 existing Cheff-identified or SynthCheX candidates. A receiver evaluates quality with MedGemma and predicted origin with a classifier on frozen DINOv3 features. Quality-based selection raises quality passes from 12 to 19 of 20 for Cheff-identified images and from 8 to 17 for SynthCheX. We find no evidence that selection improves passage through both checks: no selected Cheff-identified image passes both, while uniform, quality, and quality-constrained surrogate selection produce 2, 1, and 2 SynthCheX passes. On unprocessed test images, the origin classifier flags 4,677 of 5,000 SynthCheX images, but it also misclassify 110 of 2,297 NIH (real) images and 568 of 957 genuine images from another collection as fake. Our results further show that JPEG compression reduces SynthCheX-versus-NIH AUROC from 0.987 to 0.841. Even without processing, 152 SynthCheX images pass both pixel checks. These checks can filter submissions, but they cannot verify an acquisition claim. We strongly advocate that source and intended use must be recorded and checked separately for admission of chest radiographs in medical datasets.

We study the best-response dynamics in games with random payoffs. We consider two-player bimatrix games, with $n$ strategies each. We assume that payoffs come from a continuous distribution, and study the best-response dynamics of these games, after imposing some structure on their payoff matrices. In particular, we focus on symmetric games, antisymmetric games, common-interest games, zero-sum games, and games with independent payoffs. When two players take turns in playing the best response to the opponent's action, they eventually end up cycling through the same sequence of actions. The main focus of the paper is the cycle structure of large random games. In particular, we study the number of cycles, the number of cycles of a certain length, the length of the longest cycle, and related quantities. We show that the structure of the game has an important impact on the typical cycle structure. Our arguments are based on a representation of the best-response dynamics of these games as directed bipartite graphs, and on the cycle structure that arises in them.

In this paper, we present 5uGUE, a large language model (LLM)-driven hardware-in-the-loop agent, which enables the wireless fuzzing of 5G-enabled devices (such as mobile phones). 5uGUE combines multi-step reasoning with tool-assisted interaction and integrates into the fuzzing pipeline by leveraging specialized tools for internet search, 5G protocol analysis, memory management, and test-case execution. The agent iteratively generates test cases, executes them on targets, collects runtime feedback, and adaptively refines the fuzzing strategy. We evaluate 5uGUE on five commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) 5G devices across six LLMs. The best performing runs for 5uGUE trigger 167 crashes in total (141 novel and 31 unique) within 60 interaction turns (49 to 133 minutes total runtime). In contrast, the best runs for the state-of-the-art baseline (5GHOUL) discovers only 13 crashes in total (10 novel and 6 unique) within 150 minutes. Overall, by integrating LLM-driven agents, 5uGUE demonstrates significantly better crash discovery performance (12.8x total, 5.2x unique improvement). Notably, our experiments identified 46 unique crashes, 44 of which were confirmed by the vendors but had been previously reported. More importantly, MediaTek confirmed two previously unknown, high-severity vulnerabilities, one of which was assigned CVE-2026-20525. Finally, to demonstrate that 5uGUE is agnostic to wireless protocols, we also extend it to Bluetooth Classic with only minimal code changes. In our evaluations, 5uGUE finds an average of 6.4 novel crashes and 1.6 unique crashes. In a nutshell, 5uGUE highlights that LLM agents are capable to operate effectively beyond software-in-the-loop settings, extending autonomous vulnerability discovery to the proprietary, hardware-bound systems that affect billions of end-user devices across multiple wireless protocols.

Event-based optical flow estimation achieves high temporal resolution and dynamic range by exploiting asynchronous events, while self-supervised learning provides an effective solution to the absence of ground-truth labels. Spiking neural networks (SNNs), as brain-inspired models, process information through asynchronous spikes, naturally aligning with optical flow events. However, the temporal irregularity across event streams hinders the compact extraction of spatiotemporal features, while the absence of explicit labels leads to spurious correlations, thereby increasing redundancy within latent representations. In this paper, we propose a novel 'Compactly Compress, Time-varying Focus' training strategy. We present SICAF (Spikes Information Compression And Focus) framework that formulates the learning process as a constrained optimization with temporal modulation. It encourages self-supervised SNNs to extract compact latent representations while preventing over-compression that would discard temporal saliency. To better enable feature selectivity across time steps, we design an estimator with learnable temporal attention, achieving context awareness with cross-time dependencies. Experimental results on several datasets demonstrate that SICAF achieves state-of-the-art performance in self-supervised SNNs, with a 8.14% improvement in AEE on the MVSEC dataset and a 13.49% increase in robustness under white-box adversarial attacks.

RiO-DETR is the first real-time end-to-end transformer for oriented object detection, yet further localization gains require a more expressive box representation. Although distributional regression has succeeded in horizontal DETRs, extending it to oriented detection introduces geometry-misaligned boundary modeling and topology-inconsistent orientation refinement. We present RiO-DETRv2, a geometry-aware uncertainty modeling framework for real-time oriented object detection. To resolve the geometry mismatch, Object-Aligned Boundary Distribution Refinement represents box boundaries as probability distributions in an object-aligned coordinate system and progressively refines them across decoder layers. For better orientation topology consistency, we introduce Circular-to-Local Angular Residual Refinement that transitions from global periodic search to local fine-grained estimation. Unified OBB Quality-Aligned Learning further aligns classification, boundary and angular refinement with complete-OBB localization quality. Together, these designs improve localization without compromising efficiency, achieving a better balance between speed and accuracy. Specifically, RiO-DETRv2-l/x achieves 53.7/54.1 mAP50-95 on DOTA, outperforming RiO-DETR-l/x by 1.2/1.5 points with nearly unchanged computational cost. Code is available at https://github.com/RicePasteM/RiO-DETRv2.

This paper explores the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enable end-to-end automotive design and software development for Software-Defined Vehicles (SDVs). Based on our contributions within the Central Car Server (CeCaS) and follow-up EU-funded projects, we present an AI-driven toolchain integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) to automate the transformation of natural-language requirements into system architectures, executable software, and validation artifacts. The approach emphasizes traceability, consistency, and compliance with safety-critical automotive development requirements. Validation is performed on a centralized vehicle computing platform supporting adaptive cruise control and emergency braking, tested in Hardware-in-the-Loop (HiL) and Software-in-the-Loop (SiL) environments. We discuss current capabilities, practical limitations, and future directions toward increasingly automated, reliable, and quality-assured automotive software development with minimal human intervention.

Human-in-the-loop (HIL) post-training improves vision-language-action (VLA) policies through expert corrections, but costly human supervision and repeated real-robot evaluation limit algorithm exploration and development. We introduce SimPT (Simulation-based Post-Training), a simulation framework that automates intervention-based VLA post-training by integrating policy rollouts, corrective data collection, policy training, and standalone evaluation. To automatically determine intervention timing and recovery strategies, we develop an Agent-Compiled Progress Graph that tracks task progress using privileged simulator state and retains stable snapshots during policy execution. After a rollout fails, a CuRobo-based expert attempts recovery from these snapshots, starting at more advanced task stages and falling back to earlier ones as needed to generate corrective trajectories. We implement and compare four post-training methods, RECAP, HG-DAgger, DPO+SFT, and FlowPRO, across seven RoboTwin manipulation tasks. Relative to a fixed-interval snapshot baseline, the Progress Graph reduces recovery attempts by 75.0% and increases recovery success from 93.4% to 98.9%. Using SimPT, we develop RECAP-CF-LPF, a refinement of RECAP that combines cross-fitting and low-pass filtering of value predictions. This refinement increases the overall success rate from 76.50% to 79.36% in held-out simulation trials. In real-robot HIL post-training, it increases the success rate from 72% to 96% across 25 scenarios of an Ethernet cable-insertion task. These results demonstrate the utility of SimPT for exploring and developing VLA post-training algorithms.

There is a widespread sense that AI-generated text has recently become harder to understand. In this study, we investigate a set of psycholinguistic features that are known to correlate with human processing difficulty (e.g., object relative clauses, long syntactic dependencies, low-frequency n-grams). Using a novel corpus of AI-generated text across diverse domains, we find that AI models use these difficult features more often than paraphrases generated by round-trip translation. Compared with human writing, all nine frontier and near-frontier models use more inanimate subjects with animate verbs and more low-frequency n-grams, and most also use longer dependencies, more stacked nouns, and more reduced object relatives in conversation; we also demonstrate substantial variation across model families. We propose and test a hypothesis as to why: while human language is optimized for successful communication, AI-generated text is increasingly optimized for other goals like math, code, and reasoning, in which there is a pressure for \textit{information density} rather than successful communication. We provide a proof-of-concept for this hypothesis by fine-tuning a language model under a length penalty, which leads to a divergence from human-like linguistic behavior. Our findings highlight the axes of misalignment between linguistic processing demands in humans and LLMs, and point toward possible remedies.

This paper presents XingChen-UniFE, a unified large audio language model (LALM) for general speech restoration (GSR) and target speaker extraction (TSE). The proposed model employs complementary semantic and acoustic representations through a dual-stream encoder, where a self-supervised learning model provides hierarchical semantic features and a learnable acoustic branch captures fine-grained structures from complex spectra. A bidirectional cross-attention module further facilitates information exchange between the two representations. The fused representation conditions the LALM for discrete speech token generation with task and speaker information. Experiments demonstrate strong performance on both GSR and TSE and robust generalization to unseen degradation conditions.

Organizing radiology reports into independently generated units offers a way to generate fine-grained clinical content and bind it to visual evidence. However, existing methods typically adopt generation-unit structures not directly specified in natural reports or their annotations, introducing additional modeling compromises. We propose RadCarve, which instead defines generation units directly from the anatomical region sets in existing statement-region correspondences, unifying unit formation with visual evidence selection. RadCarve's planner uses composition-specialized query banks to jointly predict unit existence and region composition from the image, iteratively refining both with regional evidence aggregated according to current membership predictions. The generator independently produces each unit's text conditioned on the joint visual evidence of its predicted region set. Compared with strong baselines, RadCarve improves CXRFEScore by 9.4% in unit generation given region sets and achieves 2.4 times the end-to-end binding F1. It also achieves leading report-generation results on Chest ImaGenome and PadChest-GR, using fewer than one-sixth as many parameters as large-scale baselines.

Supervised fine-tuning adapts language models to specialized tasks but can disrupt previously acquired behavior. Existing approaches constrain parameters, gradients, or replay objectives, yet the connection between the protected object, the intervening trajectory, and retained outputs remains unclear. We develop a functional-path account that decomposes old-loss changes along realized updates into the controlled direction, gradient staleness, probe mismatch, and finite-step effects. The account yields a conditional refresh budget and identifies the restoring direction supplied by informative replay. Matched QLoRA interventions separate constraint granularity from placement before or after Adam: placement strongly affects retention across the studied code-label audits, whereas the granularity interaction depends on the endpoint. Checkpointed generation separates endpoint recovery from higher sampled-path accuracy, and matched replay schedules reveal loss exposure concealed by final scores. A sequential-task comparison extends this distinction to backward transfer: subspace regularization and projection improve average retention while trading off different old tasks; supervised replay protects both more consistently in this setting. Additional response interfaces distinguish content gains from exact-response retention. These findings connect update-level protection to task-wise behavior and motivate mitigation through explicit functional anchors, trajectory evaluation, and joint old/new auditing.